Once your articleis accepted for publication, you can track its status with the track your accepted article tool. Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. 31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for In practice, the implementation of step-down or step-up strategies includes 1) the use of risk prediction, 2) tools to support shared decision-making and 3) communication between . At submission, authors may suggest referees; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. At this size, the optimum font size is 8pt. In today's Big Idea, author Christian Klaver invites us to take a look into the magical world he created for his book-loving daughter. Copyright 2014-2023 All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2059-0105 (online), https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/npj-series, a list of all journals in the Nature portfolio and subject areas. npj Breast Cancer--MedSci.cn Code availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required): The underlying code [and training/validation datasets] for this study is available in [repository name] and can be accessed via this link [insert persistent URL to code]. Sources for kits should be identified. The authors must include copies of all related manuscripts with any overlap in authorship that are under consideration or in press elsewhere. Expect on average 11 weeks from submission to publication. The corresponding author should be familiar with the journals Editorial policies and is solely responsible for communicating with the journal and managing communication between coauthors. Authors should be listed last name first, followed by a comma and initials (followed by full stops) of given names. If the manuscript includes personal communications, please provide a written statement of permission from any person who is quoted. I think it seems a long time for this step. In cases where the referees' concerns are more wide-ranging, Editors will normally reject the manuscript. [CDATA[// > ; Review the letter that is generated as it might require editing or customizing. | How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. Many colourblind readers cannot interpret visuals that rely on discrimination of green and red, for example. Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Alternatively, they can be supplied as a separate supplementary data file (ideally as a plain, unformatted text file). 28 Any data necessary to evaluate the claims of the paper that are not available via a public depository should be provided as Supplementary Information. Cell Biol. tips. Keep reminding the Editor about the status of your paper. Avoid listing multiple names of genes (or proteins) separated by a slash, as in 'Oct4/Pou5f1', as this is ambiguous (it could mean a ratio, a complex, alternative names or different subunits). The decision is sent to the author. //-->3Nature CommunicationsTips - English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. E-mail permission messages are acceptable. | SCI | | | | | | PMC . If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor contacts the author with the decision. Authors AB, EF, GH declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. This usually happens if there are a lot of papers for which the reviews have already come in before yours. figshare http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.853801 (2014). Follow this link for a list of all journals in the Nature portfolio and subject areas. Best practices for authors of healthcare-related articial intelligence manuscripts Since its inception in 2017, npj Digital Medicine has attracted a disproportionate number of manuscripts reporting on uses of . Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. Authors must state whether a number that follows the sign is a standard error (s.e.m.) Responses to requests for admissions are due within 30 days after service, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of process and the initial pleading on that defendant. | This process may involve further consultation with the Reviewers and editor-mediated communications between the Reviewers. They focus on elements of methodological information that are frequently poorly reported (see more details on these elements here). Just want to know what you think based on your experience. Protocols deposited by the authors will be linked to the Online Methods section upon publication. As part of Nature Portfolio, npj Clean Water follows common policies as detailed via the menu on the left that our authors and prospective authors must follow. For all studies using custom code that is deemed central to the conclusions, a statement must be included in the Methods section, under the heading "Code availability", indicating whether and how the code can be accessed, including any restrictions. Further queries about submission and preparation of Supplementary Information should be directed to the editorial team. The npj Series operate a single-anonymized peer review process. Robert Eagling161167100-150Cell PressChem Nature Chemistry Guy15Chem , 1, 4NRTNRTNRT, NRTNHCNRTNHCNRT10000NHCCorrections163ACS National Meeting, ACSGuyGuyNature Chemistry Chem GuyChem GuypptsubmittedacceptedNature Chemistry Guy, 10emailC&EN Stable phosphorus carbene analog debutsRory WatermanPreviewA Bottle-able Phosphinidene, a new chapter in phosphorus chemistry beginsFigure 3, DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. Any Supplementary Information should be submitted with the manuscript and will be sent to referees during peer review. 0, Decision Sent to Author 21st Feb 22Waiting to Send Decision to Author 18th Feb 22Manuscript Under Consideration 18th Feb 22Manuscript Under Consideration 31st Jan 22 Editor Assigned 24th Jan 22Manuscript Received 24th Jan 222.15I have asked one of the Associate Editors, Prof. Nicolas Dzamko, to assist me with the assessment and possible peer review of your manuscript and I will contact you as soon as this process is complete., 79 If the authors have successfully addressed all the comments of the Reviewers and the Editors, the Editors will deem the paper acceptable for publication in npj Vaccines. Should your manuscript be accepted, you will receive more extensive instructions for final submission of display items. Competing interests may take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one): All authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.04.001generalspecialized, , general science, , general chemistryspecialized, UCSDGuy, general interests, , Guy9, wordGuycover letter, cover letterunder evaluationto advisoradvisorgeneralAAASemail2advisorchemistrygeneral science, , Guy, manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1Guy, peer reviewGuyDavid, 1, GuyDavid, DavidBlack FridayGuy, 1waiting for revision, 158Cell PressDr. The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. npj Series journals require potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and require referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. Use of the rainbow color scale should be avoided. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. 156, 35-39 (2002). Find submission status of your article / manuscript - Support 2.75, :3.0 | :50.0Manuscript Under Consideration , 2 |021-54481353 Data availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets): The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [insert name of repository] repository, [insert persistent URL to datasets]. Only one publication is given for each number. When referencing a dataset, a DOI or accession code should be included in the citation where available. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Any practical issues preventing code sharing will be evaluated by the Editors who reserve the right to decline the manuscript if important code is unavailable. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. If the data do not meet the assumptions of the test, then a non-parametric alternative should be used instead. 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 npj Science of Food | ScienceGate Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. (However, don't yet rewrite your manuscript . The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party name] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. npj Parkinsons Disease--MedSci.cn Please visit our contact page. Isolated mass and percent yields should be reported at the end of each protocol. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. When plotting data, we require authors to use a format that clearly shows the full data distribution. Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. (1), 147-153. This section explains the editorial processes at the npj Series, which can be outlined in the following steps: Please see our Manuscript Transfer FAQ for more information about this service. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Authorship Criteria Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below: Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Unnecessary figures should be avoided: data presented in small tables or histograms, for instance, can generally be stated briefly in the text instead. Supplementary Information is not edited, typeset or proofed, so authors should ensure that it is clearly and succinctly presented at initial submission, and that the style and terminology conform to the rest of the paper. 3170 USD as publication fees (article processing charges or APCs). How to write an appeal letter | Springer Nature Protocols and Methods //--> figshare) and use their option to provide a private sharing link for the referees to access it. X-MOL Follow this link for further information on the review process and how Editors make decisions. It is not unusual for this stage to take more than a month. 'Completed - Accept'. The corresponding author is sent proofs and is welcome to discuss changes with the Editors, but npj Precision Oncology reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. The npj Series journals are committed to publishing the highest-quality research. It should be clear what statistical test was used to generate every P value. All display items should be on a white background, and should avoid excessive boxing, unnecessary colour, spurious decorative effects (such as three-dimensional 'skyscraper' histograms) and highly pixelated computer drawings. They will send a request for final submission accompanied by detailed instructions for final changes that need to be made. If this a 'Reject and Transfer' type of decision and no previous editor has done so, you will be prompted to select target journals for the transfer offer before the Notify Author page appears. Journal names are italicized and abbreviated (with full stops) according to common usage. When acknowledging funding, our recommended best practice is that authors should acknowledge funders and grants on publications when the activities that contributed to that publication are within scope of the acknowledged grant and arise directly from a specific grant. Editorial contacts can be found by clicking on the "Help & support" button under the "For Authors" section of the journal's homepage as listed on SpringerLink Nature Portfolio Journals If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript . the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in For optimal results, prepare figures to fit A4 page-width. npj Precision Oncology--MedSci.cn Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". | Each figure legend should be presented on the same page as its figure. Use the same typeface (Arial or Helvetica) for all figures. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. Author IJ holds shares in [company name A] but and declares no non-financial competing interests. Response to Requests for Admission - Florida Circuit Court, Florida Graphs should include clearly labeled error bars. Authors must ensure that their Methods section includes adequate experimental and characterization data necessary for others in the field to reproduce their work. Authors may also choose to submit their manuscript to a journal outside of the Nature Portfolio. Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three Reviewers. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. [CDATA[// >Is a long "Ready for Decision" status a bad sign? | Editage Insights Options include: Request Revisions: This will require the Author to make minor changes, but no further peer review is required.. Please see our editorial policies page for details and to download the Reporting Summary document. Here, we have developed a screening system that enables us to determine the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by . Lettering in figures should be in lower-case type, with only the first letter of each label capitalized. 7, 10535; 10.1038/ncomms10535 (2016). The funder played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript. [CDATA[// >