But the ability to notice patterns in the world, analyze phenomena and their causes/effects, understand highly complex and abstract concepts, and make connections between things all seem to be correlated with higher levels of social awareness and persuasive ability. I cant tell if this is evidence against Crespi or whether since all intellectual abilities are correlated this is just the shadow of their high perceptual intelligence, and if we directly looked at perceptual-to-verbal ratio we would see it was lower than expected. Slate Star Codex was a blog by Scott Alexander about human cognition, politics, and medicine. Dammit, I was nodding along until you threw in sports-watching. My office mate is a big sports fan who cares a lot about his yard and house and is a fairly partisan Democratand whos also a mathematician who plays folk music and speaks several languages. Well, I think its certainly a reasonable possibility, which in my experience appears to be true, that beyond a certain point, intelligence either directly causes weirdness or is reliant upon it as a foundation. Why would you doubt it if you dont have the data? He taught himself the alphabet before he was 1 year old. Genes are not something where you can say, this is good, more of it will be better. And of course theres always survivor bias. 54K subscribers in the slatestarcodex community. The selection findings are across historical time, not recent industrial time, and theyve found that IQ is being selected for as well. 6. Ive heard stories of autistic children sometimes regressing in development around 2 years old, e.g. Autistic people being diagnosed with intellectual disabilities before theyre able to to talk and not really being undiagnosed when theyve demonstrated higher levels of ability is very much a thing. at 25/26 and Ph.D. at 29/30, so might not be of the caliber of your acquaintance, though. Plus the military is always interested in easy ways to enforce security and they arent too bothered by political correctness, so any automated defense units that I might hypothetically build could also be a profitable side-business for me. A couple of things about her birth stand out when comparing the two with the other children. Of course people like that exist. This is common-sensically true and matches previous research into all of these factors. Very simple and wrong toy model: Right, genes are NOT good or bad. My wifes father (an engineer) is likely autistic. I also need alternative means to handle a wide variety of learning and perceptual tasks. That would give me more than enough money to give the middle finger to all the ignorant normies in our politically correct society, with plenty left over to hire some bodyguards and build mechanical defense systems to insulate me from any of the outraged pearl-clutching idiots who decided to use physical violence against me when their threat of social sanctioning wasnt enough. To the best of my knowledge, the whole Idiocracy concept (humans are selecting against intelligence because smart people have fewer children) is basically nothing more than a just-so story made up by concerned pseudo-intellectuals. These questions interest me because I know a lot of people who are bright nerdy programmers married to other bright nerdy programmers, and sometimes they ask me if their children are at higher risk for autism. While autism (or at least diagnosed autism) is rarer in girls, its very much not unheard of. No background in finance required. There are almost no exceptions. A mutation in the pigment for the red cone allows a person to see two shades of red. Having more diverse cones means that they can differentiate shades of red that other people would see as identical. So the only question is whether the size of the effect is enough to fully explain the data or whether, even after adjusting out the degree to which autism is caused by mutations and environment, it still decreases IQ. Two of these are diagnosed as autistic, though with very different forms. They've also got a blog about what they're doing here. Beware Simpsons Paradox. Also, the Gardner paper has analyzed autistic patients fathers by subtype of intelligence, and there is a nonsignificant but pretty suggestive tendency for them to have higher-than-normal verbal intelligence; certainly no signs of high verbal intelligence preventing autism. I have a possible explanation for the observed distribution of intelligence in autistic people. r/slatestarcodex on Reddit: oxytocin nasal spray apparently makes an [Thanks to Marco DG for proofreading and offering suggestions]. Its a highly abnormal subset of people. children who previously had normal or even remarkable verbal abilities for their age suddenly losing words. Ah, that would explain the discrepancy. Several studies have shown a genetic link between autism and intelligence; genes that contribute to autism risk also contribute to high IQ. More evidence that autism is linked to gut bacteria Agree with your post, and especially with this part. Article I wrote about Sleep Apnea, Autism, and Neurodiversity. What do Her IQ has only been tested once, by a neuropsych, and came in around 90. If a high quantity of a good thing comes with a risk of problems that reduce the quantity again, then you could understand the ability to keep the problems at bay as foundation of the tower. Thats probably how he got to that level. All this is a purely hypothetical thought-experiment, of course. iq | Slate Star Codex MealSquares is a "nutritionally complete" food that contains a balanced diet worth of nutrients in a few tasty easily measurable units. My son was measured using the full Weschler and most of his scores were 96-99th percentile (thats VERY high). (Note that if autism is really one thing [not a complex syndrome], with high and normal functioning individuals, and high vs normal correlates with IQ, then if you only measure the normal autistics, youd get results like the above, due to sampling bias. Perhaps whats happening is that the genetic factors passed along are responsible for generally supporting IQ, but high IQ parents are having children later in life for some reason (more years of schooling than average, early stage demanding careers, saving a nest egg before starting a family). Could there be some sort of input(s)/connection(s) in early development which is responsible for the development or unfolding of intelligence like that? Engineer/scientist social mixers with barbers/hairdressers and fashion merchandisers So, part of people's problem is with the origins of ABA. And if you do have a more challenging child, youll have more energy to deal with it as a younger parent. But the basic eugenics of moving intelligence higher at the margin through differential fertility, or the soon-to-be possible embryo selection for intelligence, this is not an argument against that. Insofar as autism has a coherent definition, it is a category that embraces a variety of behavioral and neural processing anomalies. 9 hours ago View Detailed Check-in. Norwegian founders with an international team on a mission to offer the equivalent of a Norwegian social safety net globally available as a membership. most kids will be pretty clearly high or low functioning, with little in between? Indeed, higher survival rates over time might also explain why were seeing a real increase in the number of autistic children over time more of them are living long enough to be diagnosed with autism in the first place. Kylounet is drinking a CAMBIER Double Galaxy by Brasserie Cambier at Terroir Alternatif. Gifted children dont always have gifted families, though. This study of 45,000 Danes finds that genetic risk for autism correlates at about 0.2 with both IQ and educational attainment. In particular, the excess of alleles associated with higher intelligence and educational attainment was only observed in the higher functioning categories (particularly Aspergers syndrome and individuals without comorbid intellectual disability) and not in the other/unspecified PDD and intellectual disability categories. the genetic load would be due to bad luck in parent mixing (recessive-recessive pairs) and parent age. This pattern is not uncommon (my son followed this trajectory), and is partly responsible for the even less uncommon belief that vaccines cause autism, because the regression coincides with vaccination. We just rarely see them because they dont hang out with us losers. psychiatry | Slate Star Codex At least part of the story is that there are at least three different causes of autism. Evidence suggest otherwise. Given the problems measuring IQ in autistic people (spiky profiles, huge differences between ravens vs. weschler) its also possible that intellectual disabilities are overreported at 15%. Is it kind of like a bimodal distribution, i.e. Even if the definition is good, people who function poorly are more likely to seek out (or be coerced into) psychiatric treatment, and so are more likely to be identified. https://medicine.uiowa.edu/psychiatry/content/ui-research-suggests-huntingtons-disease-gene-also-vital-human-development-and-intelligence. Someone at the 99.0 percentile for intelligence would probably seem quite mediocre by SSC standards. Do I say 1.2x that of someone under 30? Or do I say, Not enough data to answer, plausibly extremely high? None are autistic, but both boys were a little socially awkwardbasically a couple years behind their classmates in this area. In this study, however, we see strong heterogeneity of genetic overlap with other traits when our ASD samples are broken into distinct subsets. Interesting. These different enrichment profiles observed provide evidence for a heterogeneous and qualitatively different genetic architecture between sub-types of ASD, which should inform future studies aiming at identifying etiologies and disease mechanisms in ASD. If we can isolate these genes for high intelligence theoretically we could duplicate them so that a person might be more certain to have both a normal gene and also a variant gene. My original post talked about dual axes, functionality and intelligence, with non-functional high intelligence becoming, effectively, a distinct kind of low intelligence. One of psychiatry's many embarrassments is how many of our drugs get discovered by accident. Autism As A Disorder Of High Intelligence, A link between Tay-Sachs gene and intelligence, https://hennyk.com/autism-and-perfect-pitch/, https://hennyk.com/book-perfect-pitch-in-the-key-of-autism/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPZn4x3uOac, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd54l8gfi7M, distinction between people with high functioning autism and Aspergers. Kindof like we could genetically engineer all people to be tetrachromats. Heck, maybe there are two different underlying conditions here that have similar enough symptoms that we categorize them together (per Scotts observation in his The Body Keeps the Score review that we tend to categorize psychiatric disorders heavily by effect, because the cause is so murky). (Apologies for a machine metaphor that is certainly misleading, but better than anything else than I can think of.). Sights and sounds are processed in the brain area that first receives it without sending it further to attach meaning. A strong preference for routine. Each genes benefit is based on underlying assumptions about how the body works, and if you change enough of those assumptions, the entire edifice becomes a failure. Lots of bright nerdy tech-aligned people dont. Probably wrong ideas generated from your writing here: We know that core elements of cognition not only do develop early in life, but *have* to develop in life. Plenty of people are both smarter and more charismatic than us. These numbers should be taken with very many grains of salt. why is the medical establishment making confident claims regarding the connection between his condition and high-functioning autism? Not just running an emulation of normal to deal with other people? There is also some link to male sex, I do believe that there are higher levels of males with low intelligence autism. About impulse control, there are two strategies being selected for here, one featuring low impulse control(the classic idiocracy strategy) and another (the religious socially conservative strategy) featuring high impulse control: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X18300976. And we're taking resources from the prior group to give to the latter. These three buckets and a few other less important factors combine to determine autism risk for any individual. Aspergers was definitionally distinguished from autism due to a lack of the cognitive deficits associated with that condition, but in 2013, the DSM-5 folded it into autism spectrum disorders, so this could make it difficult to analyse the genes of high function autistics if that was the mistake I believe it was. While their exact numbers are doubtful, I think the overall finding that common familial genes are much more important than rare de novo mutations survives and is important. In the 1800s, the average US man weighed about 155 lbs. However, I wouldnt be surprised if a statistically high proportion of people here are autistic or have autistic family members. The relatives of autistic people will usually have many of the genes for autism, but not be autistic themselves. I notice a lot of people confuse normality with charisma. Intelligence and social aptitude dont seem to be positively correlated, at least not very strongly, but theyre definitely not negatively correlated. This would also explain why theres a larger gap in autism diagnoses between rich and poor blacks and Hispanics than rich and poor whites more affluent blacks and Hispanics have access to the same resources as affluent whites do, while poor ones have worse resources than poor whites. You don't have to be a diagnosed autist to be like that. Ethics and effectiveness of ABA Therapy for Autism In a few cases, the parent gets the de novo mutation, but for whatever reason doesnt develop autism, and then passes it onto their child, who does develop autism. So the genes are a correlation but not a cause of the autism, which is due to factors incidentally related to the high IQ, for example the advanced age of the parents? And then theres Jacob Collier, who can detect, and accurately sing, the difference between an A at 440Hz and at 432Hz, and that allows him to do stuff like this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPZn4x3uOac) where he sings a 10-part harmonisation of In the Bleak Midwinter in which hes gradually shifting the key-centre upwards throughout, and then for the last verse he performs a 4-chord pivot to a key halfway between G and G# on the scale hes in at the time, by taking advantage of slight mis-definition in the equal-tempered approximations to those pivot chords that allows him to quickly shift to an entirely out-of-tune system (if you switched directly, it would just sound like trash) in just four chords without it sounding odd. The Tower vs Foundation model is probably an oversimplification of something like this. n=1, but it was striking to watch my very smart middle kid go from being a near-outcast in his good Catholic school to a guy with lots of friends at his magnet school. Reading about this seems a little bit strange at first, but I must say, I teach in the mathematics department of a university, and I observe this everyday in my best students. These 3 have a near 100% incidence rate among civil service employees that Ive had to interact with. the non-verbal. Most of these seem to be related to social ability. Slightly differently: Being gifted makes it harder to take certain things seriously. What will be interesting to see if we get weeded out before getting close to the top, and if the breakdown will stay the same. I am simply saying that when you encounter lots of GS11+ people they are exactly like Comey. Suppose the only study on age-related mortality shows that people older than 30 are 1.2x more likely to die in a given year than people younger than 30, but does not give any other information. While autism (and Asperger) has a lot of symptoms, there is one thing I noticed early on: people on the spectrum tend to take words very literally. Polimanti and Gelemter (2017) find that autism risk genes arent just sticking around. All this leads me to believe that people who are gifted and whos weirdness is more obvious are often misdiagnosed as having Asperger autism. For each parameters, there are many alleles in different locations that can bump the parameters a certain directionmake the babys head[1] a little bigger, for example. Big muscles can also reduce range of motion. was too big to go through the birth canal!
Vintage Glass Globe Table Lamps,
Havi Group Headquarters,
Lakers Future Draft Picks,
Alabama Growers Permit 2022,
Articles S